System and method for file type identification using machine learning

ABSTRACT

A system and method for file type identification involving extraction of a file-print of a file, the file-print being a unique or practically-unique representation of statistical characteristics associated with the distribution of bits in the binary contents of the file, similar to a fingerprint. The file-print is then passed to a machine learning algorithm that has been trained to recognize file types from their file-prints. The machine learning algorithm returns a predicted file type and, in some cases, a probability of correctness of the prediction. The file may then be encoded using an encoding algorithm chosen based on the predicted file type.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Priority is claimed in the application data sheet to the following patents or patent applications, each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety:

-   -   Ser. No. 17/994,359     -   Ser. No. 17/727,919     -   Ser. No. 17/501,872     -   Ser. No. 16/923,039     -   63/027,166     -   Ser. No. 16/716,098     -   Ser. No. 16/455,655     -   Ser. No. 16/200,466     -   Ser. No. 15/975,741     -   62/578,824     -   62/926,723     -   63/232,030

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention is in the field of computer data management and in particular is directed to the problem of file type identification.

Discussion of the State of the Art

As computers become an ever-greater part of our lives, and especially in the past few years, data storage has become a limiting factor worldwide. Prior to about 2010, the growth of data storage far exceeded the growth in storage demand. In fact, it was commonly considered at that time that storage was not an issue, and perhaps never would be, again. In 2010, however, with the growth of social media, cloud data centers, high tech and biotech industries, global digital data storage accelerated exponentially, and demand hit the zettabyte (1 trillion gigabytes) level. Current estimates are that data storage demand will reach 50 zettabytes by 2020. By contrast, digital storage device manufacturers produced roughly 1 zettabyte of physical storage capacity globally in 2016. We are producing data at a much faster rate than we are producing the capacity to store it. In short, we are running out of room to store data, and need a breakthrough in data storage technology to keep up with demand.

The primary solutions available at the moment are the addition of additional physical storage capacity and data compression. As noted above, the addition of physical storage will not solve the problem, as storage demand has already outstripped global manufacturing capacity. Data compression is also not a solution. A rough average compression ratio for mixed data types is 2:1, representing a doubling of storage capacity. However, as the mix of global data storage trends toward multi-media data (audio, video, and images), the space savings yielded by compression either decreases substantially, as is the case with lossless compression which allows for retention of all original data in the set, or results in degradation of data, as is the case with lossy compression which selectively discards data in order to increase compression. Even assuming a doubling of storage capacity, data compression cannot solve the global data storage problem. The method disclosed herein, on the other hand, works the same way with any type of data.

Transmission bandwidth is also increasingly becoming a bottleneck. Large data sets require tremendous bandwidth, and we are transmitting more and more data every year between large data centers. On the small end of the scale, we are adding billions of low bandwidth devices to the global network, and data transmission limitations impose constraints on the development of networked computing applications, such as the “Internet of Things.”

Furthermore, as quantum computing becomes more and more imminent, the security of data, both stored data and data streaming from one point to another via networks, becomes a critical concern as existing encryption technologies are placed at risk.

A difficulty with encoding files for storage or transmission is that the type of file may need to be identified before encoding. Identification of the file type for certain types of encoding is useful because the file type may influence how the file is encoded. Checking the file signature is one method of determining a file type, but may be unreliable or unavailable if the file has been modified or corrupted, or where more than one file type is associated with a given signature. A method is needed for obtaining a file type which is not restricted to the identification of a file signature and will be described herein.

What is needed is a fundamentally new approach to file type identification that does not rely solely on file signature information.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventor has developed a system and method for file type identification using machine learning which does not rely solely on identification by a file signature. The system and method involve a comparison of statistical similarities between the binary distributions of files of a given type. When a file is received with a missing or unreadable file signature, a statistical analysis of the file is performed to extract a “file-print” of the file, the file-print being a unique or practically-unique representation of statistical characteristics associated with the distribution of bits in the binary contents of the file, similar to a fingerprint. The file-print is then passed to a machine learning algorithm that has been trained to recognize file types from their file-prints. The machine learning algorithm returns a predicted file type and, in some cases, a probability of correctness of the prediction. The file may then be encoded using an encoding algorithm chosen based on the predicted file type.

According to a preferred embodiment, a system for identifying a file type is disclosed, comprising: a computing device which comprises a processor, a memory, and a first plurality of instructions of which is comprised of a machine-learning training algorithm, which is stored in the memory and operable on the processor; when operating on the processor this causes the processor to: retrieve information from a database containing non-volatile memory of which has data pertaining to at least a plurality of file types; the next instructions causes the processor to parse the binary contents for data which is an unknown file type; process the binary distribution-based values of this data using statistical analysis; store this analysis result in an array which is of a size divisible by two; send this array to a database which contains training data stored on non-volatile memory; connect this database with a machine-learning algorithm in order to train it for making comparisons with results for known file types to this data which is of an unknown file type. A second plurality of instructions, which is comprised of a machine-learning algorithm, which is stored in the memory and operable on the processor; when operating on the processor this causes the processor to: retrieve a file of which has an unknown file type; retrieve information containing binary distribution analysis data for known file types stored in a database which contains non-volatile memory; retrieve information containing file signature data of known file types stored in a database which contains non-volatile memory; the next instructions of which causes the processor to: process the binary distribution-based values of the file which is of an unknown file type, store the resulting analysis in an array which is of a size divisible by two; compare the results from this analysis to pre-existing data contained in the retrieved database information which contains binary distribution analysis results of known file types; the final instruction of which causes the processor to generate a predictive file type for the file.

According to a preferred embodiment, a method for identifying a file type is disclosed, comprising: a computing device which comprises of a processor, a memory, and a first plurality of instructions of which is comprised of a machine-learning training algorithm, which is stored in the memory and operable on the processor; when operating on the processor this causes the processor to: retrieve information from a database containing non-volatile memory of which has data pertaining to at least a plurality of file types; the next instructions causes the processor to parse the binary contents for data which is an unknown file type; process the binary distribution-based values of this data using statistical analysis; store this analysis result in an array which is of a size divisible by two; send this array to a database which contains training data stored on non-volatile memory; connect this database with a machine-learning algorithm in order to train it for making comparisons with results for known file types to this data which is of an unknown file type. A second plurality of instructions, which is comprised of a machine-learning algorithm, which is stored in the memory and operable on the processor; when operating on the processor this causes the processor to: retrieve a file of which has an unknown file type; retrieve information containing binary distribution analysis data for known file types stored in a database which contains non-volatile memory; retrieve information containing file signature data of known file types stored in a database which contains non-volatile memory; the next instructions of which causes the processor to: process the binary distribution-based values of the file which is of an unknown file type, store the resulting analysis in an array which is of a size divisible by two; compare the results from this analysis to pre-existing data contained in the retrieved database information which contains binary distribution analysis results of known file types; the final instruction of which causes the processor to generate a predictive file type for the file.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

The accompanying drawings illustrate several aspects and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention according to the aspects. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that the particular arrangements illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not to be considered as limiting of the scope of the invention or the claims herein in any way.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an embodiment of the system in which all components of the system are operated locally.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an embodiment of one aspect of the system, the data deconstruction engine.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an embodiment of one aspect of the system, the data reconstruction engine.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an embodiment of one aspect of the system, the library management module.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing another embodiment of the system in which data is transferred between remote locations.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an embodiment in which a standardized version of the sourceblock library and associated algorithms would be encoded as firmware on a dedicated processing chip included as part of the hardware of a plurality of devices.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of how data might be converted into reference codes using an aspect of an embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment to store data.

FIG. 9 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment to retrieve data.

FIG. 10 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment to encode data.

FIG. 11 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment to decode data.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an exemplary system architecture, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a customized library generator.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a library optimizer.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a transmission and storage engine.

FIG. 16 is a method diagram illustrating key system functionality utilizing an encoder and decoder pair.

FIG. 17 is a method diagram illustrating possible use of a hybrid encoder/decoder to improve the compression ratio.

FIG. 18 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of a data encoding system used to recursively encode data to further reduce data size.

FIG. 19 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for cyber security purposes.

FIG. 20 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to detect anomalies in received encoded data and producing a warning.

FIG. 21 is a flow diagram of a data encoding system used for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack denial.

FIG. 22 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for data mining and analysis purposes.

FIG. 23 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to enable high-speed data mining of repetitive data.

FIG. 24 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for remote software and firmware updates.

FIG. 25 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to encode and transfer software and firmware updates to a device for installation, for the purposes of reduced bandwidth consumption.

FIG. 26 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for large-scale software installation such as operating systems.

FIG. 27 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to encode new software and operating system installations for reduced bandwidth required for transference.

FIG. 28 is an exemplary system architecture diagram for a file classification system used for determining a file type.

FIG. 29 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process for determining whether a file should be passed as input to a machine-learning based classification algorithm.

FIG. 30 is flowchart describing an exemplary file-print extraction process.

FIG. 31 is an exemplary process for file type identification using a file classifier.

FIG. 32 is a flow diagram which illustrates an exemplary operation of a file signature extractor.

FIG. 33 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary hardware architecture of a computing device.

FIG. 34 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary logical architecture for a client device.

FIG. 35 is a block diagram showing an exemplary architectural arrangement of clients, servers, and external services.

FIG. 36 is another block diagram illustrating an exemplary hardware architecture of a computing device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventor has conceived, and reduced to practice, various systems and methods for file type identification using machine learning which does not rely solely on identification by a file signature. The systems and methods involve a comparison of statistical similarities between the binary distributions of files of a given type. When a file is received with a missing or unreadable file signature, a statistical analysis of the file is performed to extract a “file-print” of the file, the file-print being a unique or practically-unique representation of statistical characteristics associated with the distribution of bits in the binary contents of the file, similar to a fingerprint. The file-print is then passed to a machine learning algorithm that has been trained to recognize file types from their file-prints. The machine learning algorithm returns a predicted file type and, in some cases, a probability of correctness of the prediction. The file may then be encoded using an encoding algorithm chosen based on the predicted file type.

A difficulty with encoding files for storage or transmission is that the type of file may need to be identified before encoding. Identification of the file type for certain types of encoding is useful because the file type may influence how the file is encoded. One primary method of determining a file type is checking of the file signature information (bytes contained in the beginning of a file) for the file. However, this method may be unreliable or unavailable if the file has been modified (i.e., the file signature is no longer contained in the initial bytes or the file signature has been corrupted) or where the file signature information is that of a general text-based file type such as .ascii (there may be more than one file type classified as an .ascii based on the file signature information).

Files with unidentified file types exist in many forms, including but not limited to ASCII files, corrupted files (such as those created with incomplete data transfers or where there has been user tampering), and files that do include an identifier for its file type—known as its “file signature.” Despite the lack of a usable file signature, the binary distributions of files of a given type are expected to statistically similar. This expected consistency can be utilized to predict a file type for a file which is of an unidentified file type.

When a file is received with a missing or unreadable file signature, a statistical analysis of the file is performed to extract a “file-print” of the file, the file-print being a unique or practically-unique representation of statistical characteristics associated with the distribution of bits in the binary contents of the file, similar to a fingerprint. The file-print is then passed to a machine learning algorithm that has been trained to recognize file types from their file-prints. To use a machine learning algorithm to predict file types, the machine learning algorithm is first trained by passing file-prints for known types through the algorithm, and allowing the machine learning algorithm to identify patterns within the file-prints that are similar or dissimilar to patterns of file-prints for other known file types. After a sufficient amount of training, machine learning algorithms are able to reliably classify files of unknown type based on their file-prints without requiring file signatures.

A unique property of this method of classifying files based on file-prints is that it can be applied not only to unencoded files, but also to encoded files whose contents cannot be read. When applied to an encoded file, the file-print will be different from the file-print of the unencoded file, but will contain statistical similarities with files of similar types encoded by the same encoding process. Thus, a machine learning algorithm can be trained on file-prints for files of known types and known encoding processes, and will learn to identify the file type and encoding process for file-prints of unknown files, thus allowing for selection of the correct decoding process for the file.

In an embodiment, file-prints are generated by parsing each file into bytes (8 bits), analyzing the statistical distribution of bytes in the parsed file, and generating a 512 bit array, wherein the first 256 bits represent a mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file and the second 256 bits represent a variance from the mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file. However, many different file-prints can be generated, depending on the parsing of the file (bits, bytes, words, etc., or combinations thereof), and the statistical characteristics assessed (e.g., mean, median, variance, skewness, etc.). For example, another method of generating a file-print is to parse files into groups of two bytes (16 bits) and determining the mean and variance of every two bytes. The method chosen may depend on several factors including, but not limited to, file sizes, processing power available, desired processing time per file, desired uniqueness of the file-print, etc. However, file type recognition will generally be enhanced when comparing file-prints generated by the same method.

While the examples herein are discussed in terms of files, the methodology herein applies to data in any format (e.g., streaming data received prior to storage in a file) and in any storage location (e.g., data stored in random access memory, and not on a non-volatile data storage device as a file).

One or more different aspects may be described in the present application. Further, for one or more of the aspects described herein, numerous alternative arrangements may be described; it should be appreciated that these are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting of the aspects contained herein or the claims presented herein in any way. One or more of the arrangements may be widely applicable to numerous aspects, as may be readily apparent from the disclosure. In general, arrangements are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice one or more of the aspects, and it should be appreciated that other arrangements may be utilized and that structural, logical, software, electrical and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the particular aspects. Particular features of one or more of the aspects described herein may be described with reference to one or more particular aspects or figures that form a part of the present disclosure, and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific arrangements of one or more of the aspects. It should be appreciated, however, that such features are not limited to usage in the one or more particular aspects or figures with reference to which they are described. The present disclosure is neither a literal description of all arrangements of one or more of the aspects nor a listing of features of one or more of the aspects that must be present in all arrangements.

Headings of sections provided in this patent application and the title of this patent application are for convenience only, and are not to be taken as limiting the disclosure in any way.

Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in continuous communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more communication means or intermediaries, logical or physical.

A description of an aspect with several components in communication with each other does not imply that all such components are required. To the contrary, a variety of optional components may be described to illustrate a wide variety of possible aspects and in order to more fully illustrate one or more aspects. Similarly, although process steps, method steps, algorithms or the like may be described in a sequential order, such processes, methods and algorithms may generally be configured to work in alternate orders, unless specifically stated to the contrary. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be described in this patent application does not, in and of itself, indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order. The steps of described processes may be performed in any order practical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously despite being described or implied as occurring non-simultaneously (e.g., because one step is described after the other step). Moreover, the illustration of a process by its depiction in a drawing does not imply that the illustrated process is exclusive of other variations and modifications thereto, does not imply that the illustrated process or any of its steps are necessary to one or more of the aspects, and does not imply that the illustrated process is preferred. Also, steps are generally described once per aspect, but this does not mean they must occur once, or that they may only occur once each time a process, method, or algorithm is carried out or executed. Some steps may be omitted in some aspects or some occurrences, or some steps may be executed more than once in a given aspect or occurrence.

When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that more than one device or article may be used in place of a single device or article. Similarly, where more than one device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that a single device or article may be used in place of the more than one device or article.

The functionality or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other devices that are not explicitly described as having such functionality or features. Thus, other aspects need not include the device itself.

Techniques and mechanisms described or referenced herein will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be appreciated that particular aspects may include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. Process descriptions or blocks in figures should be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of various aspects in which, for example, functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art.

Definitions

The term “bit” refers to the smallest unit of information that can be stored or transmitted. It is in the form of a binary digit (either 0 or 1). In terms of hardware, the bit is represented as an electrical signal that is either off (representing 0) or on (representing 1).

The term “byte” refers to a series of bits exactly eight bits in length.

The term “codebook” refers to a database containing sourceblocks each with a pattern of bits and reference code unique within that library. The terms “library” and “encoding/decoding library” are synonymous with the term codebook.

The term “codeword” refers to the reference code form in which data is stored or transmitted in an aspect of the system. A codeword consists of a reference code to a sourceblock in the library plus an indication of that sourceblock's location in a particular data set.

The terms “compression” and “deflation” as used herein mean the representation of data in a more compact form than the original dataset. Compression and/or deflation may be either “lossless”, in which the data can be reconstructed in its original form without any loss of the original data, or “lossy” in which the data can be reconstructed in its original form, but with some loss of the original data.

The terms “compression ratio” and “deflation ratio”, and as used herein all mean the size of the original data relative to the size of the compressed data (e.g., if the new data is 70% of the size of the original, then the deflation/compression ratio is 70% or 0.7.)

The term “corrupt” refers to data which has been lost, removed, or altered to such a degree that makes it inoperable or unusable by a computing device.

The term “data” means information in any computer-readable form.

The term “data set” refers to a grouping of data for a particular purpose. One example of a data set might be a word processing file containing text and formatting information.

The term “effective compression” or “effective compression ratio” refers to the additional amount data that can be stored using the method herein described versus conventional data storage methods. Although the method herein described is not data compression, per se, expressing the additional capacity in terms of compression is a useful comparison.

The term “file-print” as used herein means a representation of the statistical characteristics associated with the distribution of information in the parsed contents of a file. In an embodiment, file-prints are generated by parsing each file into bytes (8 bits), analyzing the distribution of bytes in the parsed file, and generating a 512 bit array, wherein the first 256 bits represent a mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file and the second 256 bits represent a variance from the mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file.

The term “file signature” refers to a first plurality of bytes contained in a file which identifies the file type of the file. File signatures are typically located at the beginning of a file.

The term “sourcepacket” as used herein means a packet of data received for encoding or decoding. A sourcepacket may be a portion of a data set.

The term “sourceblock” as used herein means a defined number of bits or bytes used as the block size for encoding or decoding. A sourcepacket may be divisible into a number of sourceblocks. As one non-limiting example, a 1 megabyte sourcepacket of data may be encoded using 512 byte sourceblocks. The number of bits in a sourceblock may be dynamically optimized by the system during operation. In one aspect, a sourceblock may be of the same length as the block size used by a particular file system, typically 512 bytes or 4,096 bytes.

Conceptual Architecture

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an embodiment 100 of the system in which all components of the system are operated locally. As incoming data 101 is received by data deconstruction engine 102. Data deconstruction engine 102 breaks the incoming data into sourceblocks, which are then sent to library manager 103. Using the information contained in sourceblock library lookup table 104 and sourceblock library storage 105, library manager 103 returns reference codes to data deconstruction engine 102 for processing into codewords, which are stored in codeword storage 106. When a data retrieval request 107 is received, data reconstruction engine 108 obtains the codewords associated with the data from codeword storage 106, and sends them to library manager 103. Library manager 103 returns the appropriate sourceblocks to data reconstruction engine 108, which assembles them into the proper order and sends out the data in its original form 109.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an embodiment of one aspect 200 of the system, specifically data deconstruction engine 201. Incoming data 202 is received by data analyzer 203, which optimally analyzes the data based on machine learning algorithms and input 204 from a sourceblock size optimizer, which is disclosed below. Data analyzer may optionally have access to a sourceblock cache 205 of recently-processed sourceblocks, which can increase the speed of the system by avoiding processing in library manager 103. Based on information from data analyzer 203, the data is broken into sourceblocks by sourceblock creator 206, which sends sourceblocks 207 to library manager 203 for additional processing. Data deconstruction engine 201 receives reference codes 208 from library manager 103, corresponding to the sourceblocks in the library that match the sourceblocks sent by sourceblock creator 206, and codeword creator 209 processes the reference codes into codewords comprising a reference code to a sourceblock and a location of that sourceblock within the data set. The original data may be discarded, and the codewords representing the data are sent out to storage 210.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an embodiment of another aspect of system 300, specifically data reconstruction engine 301. When a data retrieval request 302 is received by data request receiver 303 (in the form of a plurality of codewords corresponding to a desired final data set), it passes the information to data retriever 304, which obtains the requested data 305 from storage. Data retriever 304 sends, for each codeword received, a reference codes from the codeword 306 to library manager 103 for retrieval of the specific sourceblock associated with the reference code. Data assembler 308 receives the sourceblock 307 from library manager 103 and, after receiving a plurality of sourceblocks corresponding to a plurality of codewords, assembles them into the proper order based on the location information contained in each codeword (recall each codeword comprises a sourceblock reference code and a location identifier that specifies where in the resulting data set the specific sourceblock should be restored to. The requested data is then sent to user 309 in its original form.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an embodiment of another aspect of the system 400, specifically library manager 401. One function of library manager 401 is to generate reference codes from sourceblocks received from data deconstruction engine 301. As sourceblocks are received 402 from data deconstruction engine 301, sourceblock lookup engine 403 checks sourceblock library lookup table 404 to determine whether those sourceblocks already exist in sourceblock library storage 105. If a particular sourceblock exists in sourceblock library storage 105, reference code return engine 405 sends the appropriate reference code 406 to data deconstruction engine 301. If the sourceblock does not exist in sourceblock library storage 105, optimized reference code generator 407 generates a new, optimized reference code based on machine learning algorithms. Optimized reference code generator 407 then saves the reference code 408 to sourceblock library lookup table 104; saves the associated sourceblock 409 to sourceblock library storage 105; and passes the reference code to reference code return engine 405 for sending 406 to data deconstruction engine 301. Another function of library manager 401 is to optimize the size of sourceblocks in the system. Based on information 411 contained in sourceblock library lookup table 104, sourceblock size optimizer 410 dynamically adjusts the size of sourceblocks in the system based on machine learning algorithms and outputs that information 412 to data analyzer 203. Another function of library manager 401 is to return sourceblocks associated with reference codes received from data reconstruction engine 301. As reference codes are received 414 from data reconstruction engine 301, reference code lookup engine 413 checks sourceblock library lookup table 415 to identify the associated sourceblocks; passes that information to sourceblock retriever 416, which obtains the sourceblocks 417 from sourceblock library storage 105; and passes them 418 to data reconstruction engine 301.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing another embodiment of system 500, in which data is transferred between remote locations. As incoming data 501 is received by data deconstruction engine 502 at Location 1, data deconstruction engine 301 breaks the incoming data into sourceblocks, which are then sent to library manager 503 at Location 1. Using the information contained in sourceblock library lookup table 504 at Location 1 and sourceblock library storage 505 at Location 1, library manager 503 returns reference codes to data deconstruction engine 301 for processing into codewords, which are transmitted 506 to data reconstruction engine 507 at Location 2. In the case where the reference codes contained in a particular codeword have been newly generated by library manager 503 at Location 1, the codeword is transmitted along with a copy of the associated sourceblock. As data reconstruction engine 507 at Location 2 receives the codewords, it passes them to library manager module 508 at Location 2, which looks up the sourceblock in sourceblock library lookup table 509 at Location 2, and retrieves the associated from sourceblock library storage 510. Where a sourceblock has been transmitted along with a codeword, the sourceblock is stored in sourceblock library storage 510 and sourceblock library lookup table 504 is updated. Library manager 503 returns the appropriate sourceblocks to data reconstruction engine 507, which assembles them into the proper order and sends the data in its original form 511.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an embodiment 600 in which a standardized version of a sourceblock library 603 and associated algorithms 604 would be encoded as firmware 602 on a dedicated processing chip 601 included as part of the hardware of a plurality of devices 600. Contained on dedicated chip 601 would be a firmware area 602, on which would be stored a copy of a standardized sourceblock library 603 and deconstruction/reconstruction algorithms 604 for processing the data. Processor 605 would have both inputs 606 and outputs 607 to other hardware on the device 600. Processor 605 would store incoming data for processing on on-chip memory 608, process the data using standardized sourceblock library 603 and deconstruction/reconstruction algorithms 604, and send the processed data to other hardware on device 600. Using this embodiment, the encoding and decoding of data would be handled by dedicated chip 601, keeping the burden of data processing off device's 600 primary processors. Any device equipped with this embodiment would be able to store and transmit data in a highly optimized, bandwidth-efficient format with any other device equipped with this embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an exemplary system architecture 1200, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. Incoming training data sets may be received at a customized library generator 1300 that processes training data to produce a customized word library 1201 comprising key-value pairs of data words (each comprising a string of bits) and their corresponding calculated binary Huffman codewords. The resultant word library 1201 may then be processed by a library optimizer 1400 to reduce size and improve efficiency, for example by pruning low-occurrence data entries or calculating approximate codewords that may be used to match more than one data word. A transmission encoder/decoder 1500 may be used to receive incoming data intended for storage or transmission, process the data using a word library 1201 to retrieve codewords for the words in the incoming data, and then append the codewords (rather than the original data) to an outbound data stream. Each of these components is described in greater detail below, illustrating the particulars of their respective processing and other functions, referring to FIGS. 2-4 .

System 1200 provides near-instantaneous source coding that is dictionary-based and learned in advance from sample training data, so that encoding and decoding may happen concurrently with data transmission. This results in computational latency that is near zero but the data size reduction is comparable to classical compression. For example, if N bits are to be transmitted from sender to receiver, the compression ratio of classical compression is C, the ratio between the deflation factor of system 1200 and that of multi-pass source coding is p, the classical compression encoding rate is R_(C) bit/s and the decoding rate is R_(D) bit/s, and the transmission speed is S bit/s, the compress-send-decompress time will be

$T_{old} = {\frac{N}{R_{C}} + \frac{N}{CS} + \frac{N}{CR_{D}}}$

while the transmit-while-coding time for system 1200 will be (assuming that encoding and decoding happen at least as quickly as network latency):

$T_{new} = \frac{N_{p}}{CS}$

so that the total data transit time improvement factor is

$\frac{T_{old}}{T_{new}} = \frac{\frac{CS}{R_{C}} + 1 + \frac{S}{R_{D}}}{p}$

which presents a savings whenever

${\frac{CS}{R_{C}} + \frac{S}{R_{D}}} > {p - {1.}}$

This is a reasonable scenario given that typical values in real-world practice are C=0.32, R_(C)=1.1·10¹², R_(D)=4.2·10¹², S=10¹¹, giving

${{\frac{CS}{R_{C}} + \frac{S}{R_{D}}} = {{0.0}53\ldots}},$

such that system 1200 will outperform the total transit time of the best compression technology available as long as its deflation factor is no more than 5% worse than compression. Such customized dictionary-based encoding will also sometimes exceed the deflation ratio of classical compression, particularly when network speeds increase beyond 100 Gb/s.

The delay between data creation and its readiness for use at a receiving end will be equal to only the source word length t (typically 5-15 bytes), divided by the deflation factor C/p and the network speed S, i.e.

${delay}_{invention} = \frac{tp}{CS}$

since encoding and decoding occur concurrently with data transmission. On the other hand, the latency associated with classical compression is

${delay}_{priorart} = {\frac{N}{R_{C}} + \frac{N}{CS} + \frac{N}{CR_{D}}}$

where N is the packet/file size. Even with the generous values chosen above as well as N=512K, t=10, and p=1.05, this results in delay_(invention)≈3.3·10⁻¹⁰ while delay_(priorart)≈1.3·10⁻⁷, a more than 400-fold reduction in latency.

A key factor in the efficiency of Huffman coding used by system 1200 is that key-value pairs be chosen carefully to minimize expected coding length, so that the average deflation/compression ratio is minimized. It is possible to achieve the best possible expected code length among all instantaneous codes using Huffman codes if one has access to the exact probability distribution of source words of a given desired length from the random variable generating them. In practice this is impossible, as data is received in a wide variety of formats and the random processes underlying the source data are a mixture of human input, unpredictable (though in principle, deterministic) physical events, and noise. System 1200 addresses this by restriction of data types and density estimation; training data is provided that is representative of the type of data anticipated in “real-world” use of system 1200, which is then used to model the distribution of binary strings in the data in order to build a Huffman code word library 1200.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a customized library generator 1300. When an incoming training data set 1301 is received, it may be analyzed using a frequency creator 1302 to analyze for word frequency (that is, the frequency with which a given word occurs in the training data set). Word frequency may be analyzed by scanning all substrings of bits and directly calculating the frequency of each substring by iterating over the data set to produce an occurrence frequency, which may then be used to estimate the rate of word occurrence in non-training data. A first Huffman binary tree is created based on the frequency of occurrences of each word in the first dataset, and a Huffman codeword is assigned to each observed word in the first dataset according to the first Huffman binary tree. Machine learning may be utilized to improve results by processing a number of training data sets and using the results of each training set to refine the frequency estimations for non-training data, so that the estimation yield better results when used with real-world data (rather than, for example, being only based on a single training data set that may not be very similar to a received non-training data set). A second Huffman tree creator 1303 may be utilized to identify words that do not match any existing entries in a word library 1201 and pass them to a hybrid encoder/decoder 1304, that then calculates a binary Huffman codeword for the mismatched word and adds the codeword and original data to the word library 1201 as a new key-value pair. In this manner, customized library generator 1300 may be used both to establish an initial word library 1201 from a first training set, as well as expand the word library 1201 using additional training data to improve operation.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a library optimizer 1400. A pruner 1401 may be used to load a word library 1201 and reduce its size for efficient operation, for example by sorting the word library 1201 based on the known occurrence probability of each key-value pair and removing low-probability key-value pairs based on a loaded threshold parameter. This prunes low-value data from the word library to trim the size, eliminating large quantities of very-low-frequency key-value pairs such as single-occurrence words that are unlikely to be encountered again in a data set. Pruning eliminates the least-probable entries from word library 1201 up to a given threshold, which will have a negligible impact on the deflation factor since the removed entries are only the least-common ones, while the impact on word library size will be larger because samples drawn from asymptotically normal distributions (such as the log-probabilities of words generated by a probabilistic finite state machine, a model well-suited to a wide variety of real-world data) which occur in tails of the distribution are disproportionately large in counting measure. A delta encoder 1402 may be utilized to apply delta encoding to a plurality of words to store an approximate codeword as a value in the word library, for which each of the plurality of source words is a valid corresponding key. This may be used to reduce library size by replacing numerous key-value pairs with a single entry for the approximate codeword and then represent actual codewords using the approximate codeword plus a delta value representing the difference between the approximate codeword and the actual codeword. Approximate coding is optimized for low-weight sources such as Golomb coding, run-length coding, and similar techniques. The approximate source words may be chosen by locality-sensitive hashing, so as to approximate Hamming distance without incurring the intractability of nearest-neighbor-search in Hamming space. A parametric optimizer 1403 may load configuration parameters for operation to optimize the use of the word library 1201 during operation. Best-practice parameter/hyperparameter optimization strategies such as stochastic gradient descent, quasi-random grid search, and evolutionary search may be used to make optimal choices for all interdependent settings playing a role in the functionality of system 1200. In cases where lossless compression is not required, the delta value may be discarded at the expense of introducing some limited errors into any decoded (reconstructed) data.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a more detailed architecture for a transmission encoder/decoder 1500. According to various arrangements, transmission encoder/decoder 1500 may be used to deconstruct data for storage or transmission, or to reconstruct data that has been received, using a word library 1201. A library comparator 1501 may be used to receive data comprising words or codewords, and compare against a word library 1201 by dividing the incoming stream into substrings of length t and using a fast hash to check word library 1201 for each substring. If a substring is found in word library 1201, the corresponding key/value (that is, the corresponding source word or codeword, according to whether the substring used in comparison was itself a word or codeword) is returned and appended to an output stream. If a given substring is not found in word library 1201, a mismatch handler 1502 and hybrid encoder/decoder 1503 may be used to handle the mismatch similarly to operation during the construction or expansion of word library 1201. A mismatch handler 1502 may be utilized to identify words that do not match any existing entries in a word library 1201 and pass them to a hybrid encoder/decoder 1503, that then calculates a binary Huffman codeword for the mismatched word and adds the codeword and original data to the word library 1201 as a new key-value pair. The newly-produced codeword may then be appended to the output stream. In arrangements where a mismatch indicator is included in a received data stream, this may be used to preemptively identify a substring that is not in word library 1201 (for example, if it was identified as a mismatch on the transmission end), and handled accordingly without the need for a library lookup.

FIG. 19 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for cyber security purposes. Much like in FIG. 1 , incoming data 101 to be deconstructed is sent to a data deconstruction engine 102, which may attempt to deconstruct the data and turn it into a collection of codewords using a library manager 103. Codeword storage 106 serves to store unique codewords from this process, and may be queried by a data reconstruction engine 108 which may reconstruct the original data from the codewords, using a library manager 103. However, a cybersecurity gateway 1900 is present, communicating in-between a library manager 103 and a deconstruction engine 102, and containing an anomaly detector 1910 and distributed denial of service (DDoS) detector 1920. The anomaly detector examines incoming data to determine whether there is a disproportionate number of incoming reference codes that do not match reference codes in the existing library. A disproportionate number of non-matching reference codes may indicate that data is being received from an unknown source, of an unknown type, or contains unexpected (possibly malicious) data. If the disproportionate number of non-matching reference codes exceeds an established threshold or persists for a certain length of time, the anomaly detector 1910 raises a warning to a system administrator. Likewise, the DDoS detector 1920 examines incoming data to determine whether there is a disproportionate amount of repetitive data. A disproportionate amount of repetitive data may indicate that a DDoS attack is in progress. If the disproportionate amount of repetitive data exceeds an established threshold or persists for a certain length of time, the DDoS detector 1910 raises a warning to a system administrator. In this way, a data encoding system may detect and warn users of, or help mitigate, common cyber-attacks that result from a flow of unexpected and potentially harmful data, or attacks that result from a flow of too much irrelevant data meant to slow down a network or system, as in the case of a DDoS attack.

FIG. 22 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for data mining and analysis purposes. Much like in FIG. 1 , incoming data 101 to be deconstructed is sent to a data deconstruction engine 102, which may attempt to deconstruct the data and turn it into a collection of codewords using a library manager 103. Codeword storage 106 serves to store unique codewords from this process, and may be queried by a data reconstruction engine 108 which may reconstruct the original data from the codewords, using a library manager 103. A data analysis engine 2210, typically operating while the system is otherwise idle, sends requests for data to the data reconstruction engine 108, which retrieves the codewords representing the requested data from codeword storage 106, reconstructs them into the data represented by the codewords, and send the reconstructed data to the data analysis engine 2210 for analysis and extraction of useful data (i.e., data mining). Because the speed of reconstruction is significantly faster than decompression using traditional compression technologies (i.e., significantly less decompression latency), this approach makes data mining feasible. Very often, data stored using traditional compression is not mined precisely because decompression lag makes it unfeasible, especially during shorter periods of system idleness. Increasing the speed of data reconstruction broadens the circumstances under which data mining of stored data is feasible.

FIG. 24 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for remote software and firmware updates. Software and firmware updates typically require smaller, but more frequent, file transfers. A server which hosts a software or firmware update 2410 may host an encoding-decoding system 2420, allowing for data to be encoded into, and decoded from, sourceblocks or codewords, as disclosed in previous figures. Such a server may possess a software update, operating system update, firmware update, device driver update, or any other form of software update, which in some cases may be minor changes to a file, but nevertheless necessitate sending the new, completed file to the recipient. Such a server is connected over a network 2430, which is further connected to a recipient computer 2440, which may be connected to a server 2410 for receiving such an update to its system. In this instance, the recipient device 2440 also hosts the encoding and decoding system 2450, along with a codebook or library of reference codes that the hosting server 2410 also shares. The updates are retrieved from storage at the hosting server 2410 in the form of codewords, transferred over the network 2430 in the form of codewords, and reconstructed on the receiving computer 2440. In this way, a far smaller file size, and smaller total update size, may be sent over a network. The receiving computer 2440 may then install the updates on any number of target computing devices 2460 a-n, using a local network or other high-bandwidth connection.

FIG. 26 is an exemplary system architecture of a data encoding system used for large-scale software installation such as operating systems. Large-scale software installations typically require very large, but infrequent, file transfers. A server which hosts an installable software 2610 may host an encoding-decoding system 2620, allowing for data to be encoded into, and decoded from, sourceblocks or codewords, as disclosed in previous figures. The files for the large scale software installation are hosted on the server 2610, which is connected over a network 2630 to a recipient computer 2640. In this instance, the encoding and decoding system 2650 a-n is stored on or connected to one or more target devices 2660 a-n, along with a codebook or library of reference codes that the hosting server 2610 shares. The software is retrieved from storage at the hosting server 2610 in the form of codewords, and transferred over the network 2630 in the form of codewords to the receiving computer 2640. However, instead of being reconstructed at the receiving computer 2640, the codewords are transmitted to one or more target computing devices, and reconstructed and installed directly on the target devices 2660 a-n. In this way, a far smaller file size, and smaller total update size, may be sent over a network or transferred between computing devices, even where the network 2630 between the receiving computer 2640 and target devices 2660 a-n is low bandwidth, or where there are many target devices 2660 a-n.

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD ASPECTS

Machine-learning based algorithms may improve the accuracy of their result by enhancing the dataset of which it reads on. By providing the machine learning with more data—such as is used in the case with the file type identification system—the accuracy of its returned value may continuously be improved overtime by the addition of more data being stored in its “training” dataset. The functionality of such a file type identification algorithm is intended to provide a predictive result for a file type based on the comparison of pre-existing data—which is data contained in a dataset for the algorithm—and is compared to incoming data which needs its file type identified.

To expand on this idea for the file identification system, if a file is corrupt (which may occur from incomplete data transfers or even a user tampering with said file) it may be impossible to identify its file type based on the file signature—which is a traditional method known by those skilled in the art for determining a file type. With such a case, to rectify the situation of an unidentifiable file type the only possibility is to utilize what information is there to provide a predictive result for what the file type would be prior to its corruption. Luckily, the binary information of files is often consistent amongst files of the same type, thus there is a possible method—of which this invention aims to provide and will be described herein—which allows for a means of determining an unknown file type.

Since the library consists of re-usable building sourceblocks, and the actual data is represented by reference codes to the library, the total storage space of a single set of data would be much smaller than conventional methods, wherein the data is stored in its entirety. The more data sets that are stored, the larger the library becomes, and the more data can be stored in reference code form.

As an analogy, imagine each data set as a collection of printed books that are only occasionally accessed. The amount of physical shelf space required to store many collections would be quite large, and is analogous to conventional methods of storing every single bit of data in every data set. Consider, however, storing all common elements within and across books in a single library, and storing the books as references codes to those common elements in that library. As a single book is added to the library, it will contain many repetitions of words and phrases. Instead of storing the whole words and phrases, they are added to a library, and given a reference code, and stored as reference codes. At this scale, some space savings may be achieved, but the reference codes will be on the order of the same size as the words themselves. As more books are added to the library, larger phrases, quotations, and other words patterns will become common among the books. The larger the word patterns, the smaller the reference codes will be in relation to them as not all possible word patterns will be used. As entire collections of books are added to the library, sentences, paragraphs, pages, or even whole books will become repetitive. There may be many duplicates of books within a collection and across multiple collections, many references and quotations from one book to another, and much common phraseology within books on particular subjects. If each unique page of a book is stored only once in a common library and given a reference code, then a book of 1,000 pages or more could be stored on a few printed pages as a string of codes referencing the proper full-sized pages in the common library. The physical space taken up by the books would be dramatically reduced. The more collections that are added, the greater the likelihood that phrases, paragraphs, pages, or entire books will already be in the library, and the more information in each collection of books can be stored in reference form. Accessing entire collections of books is then limited not by physical shelf space, but by the ability to reprint and recycle the books as needed for use.

The projected increase in storage capacity using the method herein described is primarily dependent on two factors: 1) the ratio of the number of bits in a block to the number of bits in the reference code, and 2) the amount of repetition in data being stored by the system.

With respect to the first factor, the number of bits used in the reference codes to the sourceblocks must be smaller than the number of bits in the sourceblocks themselves in order for any additional data storage capacity to be obtained. As a simple example, 16-bit sourceblocks would require 2¹⁶, or 65536, unique reference codes to represent all possible patterns of bits. If all possible 65536 blocks patterns are utilized, then the reference code itself would also need to contain sixteen bits in order to refer to all possible 65,536 blocks patterns. In such case, there would be no storage savings. However, if only 16 of those block patterns are utilized, the reference code can be reduced to 4 bits in size, representing an effective compression of 4 times (16 bits/4 bits=4) versus conventional storage. Using a typical block size of 512 bytes, or 4,096 bits, the number of possible block patterns is 2^(4,096), which for all practical purposes is unlimited. A typical hard drive contains one terabyte (TB) of physical storage capacity, which represents 1,953,125,000, or roughly 2³¹, 512 byte blocks. Assuming that 1 TB of unique 512-byte sourceblocks were contained in the library, and that the reference code would thus need to be 31 bits long, the effective compression ratio for stored data would be on the order of 132 times (4,096/31≈132) that of conventional storage.

With respect to the second factor, in most cases it could be assumed that there would be sufficient repetition within a data set such that, when the data set is broken down into sourceblocks, its size within the library would be smaller than the original data. However, it is conceivable that the initial copy of a data set could require somewhat more storage space than the data stored in a conventional manner, if all or nearly all sourceblocks in that set were unique. For example, assuming that the reference codes are 1/10^(th) the size of a full-sized copy, the first copy stored as sourceblocks in the library would need to be 1.1 megabytes (MB), (1 MB for the complete set of full-sized sourceblocks in the library and 0.1 MB for the reference codes). However, since the sourceblocks stored in the library are universal, the more duplicate copies of something you save, the greater efficiency versus conventional storage methods. Conventionally, storing 10 copies of the same data requires 10 times the storage space of a single copy. For example, ten copies of a 1 MB file would take up 10 MB of storage space. However, using the method described herein, only a single full-sized copy is stored, and subsequent copies are stored as reference codes. Each additional copy takes up only a fraction of the space of the full-sized copy. For example, again assuming that the reference codes are 1/10^(th) the size of the full-size copy, ten copies of a 1 MB file would take up only 2 MB of space (1 MB for the full-sized copy, and 0.1 MB each for ten sets of reference codes). The larger the library, the more likely that part or all of incoming data will duplicate sourceblocks already existing in the library.

The size of the library could be reduced in a manner similar to storage of data. Where sourceblocks differ from each other only by a certain number of bits, instead of storing a new sourceblock that is very similar to one already existing in the library, the new sourceblock could be represented as a reference code to the existing sourceblock, plus information about which bits in the new block differ from the existing block. For example, in the case where 512 byte sourceblocks are being used, if the system receives a new sourceblock that differs by only one bit from a sourceblock already existing in the library, instead of storing a new 512 byte sourceblock, the new sourceblock could be stored as a reference code to the existing sourceblock, plus a reference to the bit that differs. Storing the new sourceblock as a reference code plus changes would require only a few bytes of physical storage space versus the 512 bytes that a full sourceblock would require. The algorithm could be optimized to store new sourceblocks in this reference code plus changes form unless the changes portion is large enough that it is more efficient to store a new, full sourceblock.

It will be understood by one skilled in the art that transfer and synchronization of data would be increased to the same extent as for storage. By transferring or synchronizing reference codes instead of full-sized data, the bandwidth requirements for both types of operations are dramatically reduced.

In addition, the method described herein is inherently a form of encryption. When the data is converted from its full form to reference codes, none of the original data is contained in the reference codes. Without access to the library of sourceblocks, it would be impossible to re-construct any portion of the data from the reference codes. This inherent property of the method described herein could obviate the need for traditional encryption algorithms, thereby offsetting most or all of the computational cost of conversion of data back and forth to reference codes. In theory, the method described herein should not utilize any additional computing power beyond traditional storage using encryption algorithms. Alternatively, the method described herein could be in addition to other encryption algorithms to increase data security even further.

In other embodiments, additional security features could be added, such as: creating a proprietary library of sourceblocks for proprietary networks, physical separation of the reference codes from the library of sourceblocks, storage of the library of sourceblocks on a removable device to enable easy physical separation of the library and reference codes from any network, and incorporation of proprietary sequences of how sourceblocks are read and the data reassembled.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of how data might be converted into reference codes using an aspect of an embodiment 700. As data is received 701, it is read by the processor in sourceblocks of a size dynamically determined by the previously disclosed sourceblock size optimizer 410. In this example, each sourceblock is 16 bits in length, and the library 702 initially contains three sourceblocks with reference codes 00, 01, and 10. The entry for reference code 11 is initially empty. As each 16 bit sourceblock is received, it is compared with the library. If that sourceblock is already contained in the library, it is assigned the corresponding reference code. So, for example, as the first line of data (0000 0011 0000 0000) is received, it is assigned the reference code (01) associated with that sourceblock in the library. If that sourceblock is not already contained in the library, as is the case with the third line of data (0000 1111 0000 0000) received in the example, that sourceblock is added to the library and assigned a reference code, in this case 11. The data is thus converted 703 to a series of reference codes to sourceblocks in the library. The data is stored as a collection of codewords, each of which contains the reference code to a sourceblock and information about the location of the sourceblocks in the data set. Reconstructing the data is performed by reversing the process. Each stored reference code in a data collection is compared with the reference codes in the library, the corresponding sourceblock is read from the library, and the data is reconstructed into its original form.

FIG. 8 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment 800 to store data. As data is received 801, it would be deconstructed into sourceblocks 802, and passed 803 to the library management module for processing. Reference codes would be received back 804 from the library management module, and could be combined with location information to create codewords 805, which would then be stored 806 as representations of the original data.

FIG. 9 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment 900 to retrieve data. When a request for data is received 901, the associated codewords would be retrieved 902 from the library. The codewords would be passed 903 to the library management module, and the associated sourceblocks would be received back 904. Upon receipt, the sourceblocks would be assembled 905 into the original data using the location data contained in the codewords, and the reconstructed data would be sent out 906 to the requestor.

FIG. 10 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment 1000 to encode data. As sourceblocks are received 1001 from the deconstruction engine, they would be compared 1002 with the sourceblocks already contained in the library. If that sourceblock already exists in the library, the associated reference code would be returned 1005 to the deconstruction engine. If the sourceblock does not already exist in the library, a new reference code would be created 1003 for the sourceblock. The new reference code and its associated sourceblock would be stored 1004 in the library, and the reference code would be returned to the deconstruction engine.

FIG. 11 is a method diagram showing the steps involved in using an embodiment 1100 to decode data. As reference codes are received 1101 from the reconstruction engine, the associated sourceblocks are retrieved 1102 from the library, and returned 1103 to the reconstruction engine.

FIG. 16 is a method diagram illustrating key system functionality utilizing an encoder and decoder pair, according to a preferred embodiment. In a first step 1601, at least one incoming data set may be received at a customized library generator 1300 that then 1602 processes data to produce a customized word library 1201 comprising key-value pairs of data words (each comprising a string of bits) and their corresponding calculated binary Huffman codewords. A subsequent dataset may be received, and compared to the word library 1603 to determine the proper codewords to use in order to encode the dataset. Words in the dataset are checked against the word library and appropriate encodings are appended to a data stream 1604. If a word is mismatched within the word library and the dataset, meaning that it is present in the dataset but not the word library, then a mismatched code is appended, followed by the unencoded original word. If a word has a match within the word library, then the appropriate codeword in the word library is appended to the data stream. Such a data stream may then be stored or transmitted 1605 to a destination as desired. For the purposes of decoding, an already-encoded data stream may be received and compared 1606, and un-encoded words may be appended to a new data stream 1607 depending on word matches found between the encoded data stream and the word library that is present. A matching codeword that is found in a word library is replaced with the matching word and appended to a data stream, and a mismatch code found in a data stream is deleted and the following unencoded word is re-appended to a new data stream, the inverse of the process of encoding described earlier. Such a data stream may then be stored or transmitted 1608 as desired.

FIG. 17 is a method diagram illustrating possible use of a hybrid encoder/decoder to improve the compression ratio, according to a preferred aspect. A second Huffman binary tree may be created 1701, having a shorter maximum length of codewords than a first Huffman binary tree 1602, allowing a word library to be filled with every combination of codeword possible in this shorter Huffman binary tree 1702. A word library may be filled with these Huffman codewords and words from a dataset 1702, such that a hybrid encoder/decoder 1304, 1503 may receive any mismatched words from a dataset for which encoding has been attempted with a first Huffman binary tree 1703, 1604 and parse previously mismatched words into new partial codewords (that is, codewords that are each a substring of an original mismatched codeword) using the second Huffman binary tree 1704. In this way, an incomplete word library may be supplemented by a second word library. New codewords attained in this way may then be returned to a transmission encoder 1705, 1500. In the event that an encoded dataset is received for decoding, and there is a mismatch code indicating that additional coding is needed, a mismatch code may be removed and the unencoded word used to generate a new codeword as before 1706, so that a transmission encoder 1500 may have the word and newly generated codeword added to its word library 1707, to prevent further mismatching and errors in encoding and decoding.

It will be recognized by a person skilled in the art that the methods described herein can be applied to data in any form. For example, the method described herein could be used to store genetic data, which has four data units: C, G, A, and T. Those four data units can be represented as 2 bit sequences: 00, 01, 10, and 11, which can be processed and stored using the method described herein.

It will be recognized by a person skilled in the art that certain embodiments of the methods described herein may have uses other than data storage. For example, because the data is stored in reference code form, it cannot be reconstructed without the availability of the library of sourceblocks. This is effectively a form of encryption, which could be used for cyber security purposes. As another example, an embodiment of the method described herein could be used to store backup copies of data, provide for redundancy in the event of server failure, or provide additional security against cyberattacks by distributing multiple partial copies of the library among computers are various locations, ensuring that at least two copies of each sourceblock exist in different locations within the network.

FIG. 18 is a flow diagram illustrating the use of a data encoding system used to recursively encode data to further reduce data size. Data may be input 1805 into a data deconstruction engine 102 to be deconstructed into code references, using a library of code references based on the input 1810. Such example data is shown in a converted, encoded format 1815, highly compressed, reducing the example data from 96 bits of data, to 12 bits of data, before sending this newly encoded data through the process again 1820, to be encoded by a second library 1825, reducing it even further. The newly converted data 1830 is shown as only 6 bits in this example, thus a size of 6.25% of the original data packet. With recursive encoding, then, it is possible and implemented in the system to achieve increasing compression ratios, using multi-layered encoding, through recursively encoding data. Both initial encoding libraries 1810 and subsequent libraries 1825 may be achieved through machine learning techniques to find optimal encoding patterns to reduce size, with the libraries being distributed to recipients prior to transfer of the actual encoded data, such that only the compressed data 1830 must be transferred or stored, allowing for smaller data footprints and bandwidth requirements. This process can be reversed to reconstruct the data. While this example shows only two levels of encoding, recursive encoding may be repeated any number of times. The number of levels of recursive encoding will depend on many factors, a non-exhaustive list of which includes the type of data being encoded, the size of the original data, the intended usage of the data, the number of instances of data being stored, and available storage space for codebooks and libraries. Additionally, recursive encoding can be applied not only to data to be stored or transmitted, but also to the codebooks and/or libraries, themselves. For example, many installations of different libraries could take up a substantial amount of storage space. Recursively encoding those different libraries to a single, universal library would dramatically reduce the amount of storage space required, and each different library could be reconstructed as necessary to reconstruct incoming streams of data.

FIG. 20 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to detect anomalies in received encoded data and producing a warning. A system may have trained encoding libraries 2010, before data is received from some source such as a network connected device or a locally connected device including USB connected devices, to be decoded 2020. Decoding in this context refers to the process of using the encoding libraries to take the received data and attempt to use encoded references to decode the data into its original source 2030, potentially more than once if recursive encoding was used, but not necessarily more than once. An anomaly detector 1910 may be configured to detect a large amount of un-encoded data 2040 in the midst of encoded data, by locating data or references that do not appear in the encoding libraries, indicating at least an anomaly, and potentially data tampering or faulty encoding libraries. A flag or warning is set by the system 2050, allowing a user to be warned at least of the presence of the anomaly and the characteristics of the anomaly. However, if a large amount of invalid references or unencoded data are not present in the encoded data that is attempting to be decoded, the data may be decoded and output as normal 2060, indicating no anomaly has been detected.

FIG. 21 is a flow diagram of a method used for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack denial. A system may have trained encoding libraries 2110, before data is received from some source such as a network connected device or a locally connected device including USB connected devices, to be decoded 2120. Decoding in this context refers to the process of using the encoding libraries to take the received data and attempt to use encoded references to decode the data into its original source 2130, potentially more than once if recursive encoding was used, but not necessarily more than once. A DDoS detector 1920 may be configured to detect a large amount of repeating data 2140 in the encoded data, by locating data or references that repeat many times over (the number of which can be configured by a user or administrator as need be), indicating a possible DDoS attack. A flag or warning is set by the system 2150, allowing a user to be warned at least of the presence of a possible DDoS attack, including characteristics about the data and source that initiated the flag, allowing a user to then block incoming data from that source. However, if a large amount of repeat data in a short span of time is not detected, the data may be decoded and output as normal 2160, indicating no DDoS attack has been detected.

FIG. 23 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to enable high-speed data mining of repetitive data. A system may have trained encoding libraries 2310, before data is received from some source such as a network connected device or a locally connected device including USB connected devices, to be analyzed 2320 and decoded 2330. When determining data for analysis, users may select specific data to designate for decoding 2330, before running any data mining or analytics functions or software on the decoded data 2340. Rather than having traditional decryption and decompression operate over distributed drives, data can be regenerated immediately using the encoding libraries disclosed herein, as it is being searched. Using methods described in FIG. 9 and FIG. 11 , data can be stored, retrieved, and decoded swiftly for searching, even across multiple devices, because the encoding library may be on each device. For example, if a group of servers host codewords relevant for data mining purposes, a single computer can request these codewords, and the codewords can be sent to the recipient swiftly over the bandwidth of their connection, allowing the recipient to locally decode the data for immediate evaluation and searching, rather than running slow, traditional decompression algorithms on data stored across multiple devices or transfer larger sums of data across limited bandwidth.

FIG. 25 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to encode and transfer software and firmware updates to a device for installation, for the purposes of reduced bandwidth consumption. A first system may have trained code libraries or “codebooks” present 2510, allowing for a software update of some manner to be encoded 2520. Such a software update may be a firmware update, operating system update, security patch, application patch or upgrade, or any other type of software update, patch, modification, or upgrade, affecting any computer system. A codebook for the patch must be distributed to a recipient 2530, which may be done beforehand and either over a network or through a local or physical connection, but must be accomplished at some point in the process before the update may be installed on the recipient device 2560. An update may then be distributed to a recipient device 2540, allowing a recipient with a codebook distributed to them 2530 to decode the update 2550 before installation 2560. In this way, an encoded and thus heavily compressed update may be sent to a recipient far quicker and with less bandwidth usage than traditional lossless compression methods for data, or when sending data in uncompressed formats. This especially may benefit large distributions of software and software updates, as with enterprises updating large numbers of devices at once.

FIG. 27 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method used to encode new software and operating system installations for reduced bandwidth required for transference. A first system may have trained code libraries or “codebooks” present 2710, allowing for a software installation of some manner to be encoded 2720. Such a software installation may be a software update, operating system, security system, application, or any other type of software installation, execution, or acquisition, affecting a computer system. An encoding library or “codebook” for the installation must be distributed to a recipient 2730, which may be done beforehand and either over a network or through a local or physical connection, but must be accomplished at some point in the process before the installation can begin on the recipient device 2760. An installation may then be distributed to a recipient device 2740, allowing a recipient with a codebook distributed to them 2730 to decode the installation 2750 before executing the installation 2760. In this way, an encoded and thus heavily compressed software installation may be sent to a recipient far quicker and with less bandwidth usage than traditional lossless compression methods for data, or when sending data in uncompressed formats. This especially may benefit large distributions of software and software updates, as with enterprises updating large numbers of devices at once.

FIG. 28 is an exemplary system architecture diagram for a file classification system used for determining a file type 2800. As a file is received 2802, a file signature extractor 3200 attempts to find and read a file signature of the file. The file signature extractor 3200 may search a file signature database 2804 to determine the expected location and structure of the file signature. If a file signature is found and is readable, the file type determining process is concluded and the file may be routed (along with its file type information) for further processing, such as to a codebook lookup table 2808 whereby the data encoder 2809 may encode the file based on a codebook associated with that file type in the database. If the file type determining process is concluded after a file signature is found, the file print extractor and file classifier may be instructed to cease operations, as the file type has already been determined.

If the file signature is not recognized in file-signature database 2804, or is recognized as a general text-based file type such as .ascii which is used for storing many different types of information, the file is routed to a file-print extraction algorithm 2805 which parses file into bytes and performs statistical analyses on the parsed file to generate the file's “file-print.” The file-print may be generated by a machine learning algorithm trained on file-prints stored in a file-print database 2806. The file-print is sent to a file classifier, which uses a trained machine learning algorithm to identify a file type based on the file-print.

FIG. 29 is a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process for determining whether a file should be passed as input to a machine-learning based classification algorithm. A file, which may be locally stored on a computing device or sent/received over a network, is scanned for a file signature 2901, which is typically contained at the beginning of the file. The scan may be based on a list of file signatures stored in a database that contains the locations and structure of known file signatures 2902. If a file signature is recognized the file may be sent for further processing such as selection of a codebook for encoding files of the type contained in the file signature 2904, and encoding of the file based on the selected codebook 2905. If the file signature is missing or not recognized, the file is sent to a file classifier for further identification based on file-printing 2903.

FIG. 30 is flowchart describing an exemplary file-print extraction process. In this example, a file is parsed into bytes (here shown as pairs of hexadecimal values) 3002, 3003. A data analyzer 3004 performs statistical calculations of the distribution of bytes in the parsed file and, in this simplified example, generates a 24-bit array file print 3005, wherein the first 12 bits represent a mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file and the second 12 bits represent a variance from the mean value for the distribution of bytes in the file. The file-print 3005 is then sent to a file classifier 3100 which uses a trained machine learning algorithm to identify the file type. While a simplified 24-bit file print 3005 is shown here, larger file-prints will typically be used.

FIG. 31 is an exemplary process for file type identification using a file classifier. The file classifier 3100 uses a trained machine learning algorithm to identify the file type of an unknown file from its file-print 3105. The machine learning algorithm is trained on file-prints for a plurality of files of known types. A file type training set 3101 may comprise file-prints 3102 derived from many thousands or millions of files 3103, each file-print 3102 comprising an array containing a mean value of the occurrence of each byte in the distribution of bytes in the file 3102 a and a standard deviation of the mean value of the number of occurrences from the mean value of the expected number of occurrences 3102 b. This simplified diagram shows file-prints with an array of 18 bits, with the mean value 3102 a being 9 bits and the standard deviation 3102 b being 9 bits, but real-work applications would typically contain larger arrays.

After the machine learning algorithm 3107 is trained using the file type training sets 3101, file-prints for files of unknown types 3105 may be passed through the machine learning algorithm 3107 which will identify the file type of the unknown file based on its training. The machine learning algorithm's data may be stored in a file-print database 3104, and confirmations of properly-identified files may be used as training data to further improve the machine learning algorithm's accuracy.

In some embodiments, a file-print may be sent through the machine learning algorithm more than once, and comparisons may be made between the file type predictions of the algorithm after each pass-through. In some embodiments, parameters for mean and variance may be altered with each pass-through of the algorithm until a sufficiently similar file-print for a known file type is identified. Limits may be imposed on the amount of pass-throughs for the algorithm whereby reaching said limit may prompt the user with its lack of satisfactory result (which is a value that may be determined by the implementation from the programmer).

In some embodiments, a minimum file size may be required so that each file contains a sufficient amount of data to generate valid statistical data to allow for the binary distribution analysis method described herein. In some cases, for example when a file is corrupted or the file is very short, there may not be enough binary information to develop a valid file-print for the file.

In some embodiments, the machine learning algorithm 3107 may produce a probability that the identified or predicted file type is correct. In such cases, threshold values may be established to require a certain percentage of similarity amongst the binary distribution-based analysis results of an unidentified file type with a certain file type contained in a database of file types before determining its file type prediction 3106. For example, if the machine learning algorithm 3107 conducts a pass through of a parsed file and determines that its prediction is correct only to a low probability (for example, 25%), the machine learning algorithm 3107 may go through repeated pass-throughs, but re-parsing the file into a different grouping at each pass-through. For example, if the file is initially parsed at every 2 bytes, in subsequent pass-throughs, the file might be parsed at 3 bytes, and then 4 bytes, etc., to see if the machine learning algorithm 3107 identifies a file type with a higher probability of accuracy, depending on the parsing of the file.

FIG. 32 is a flow diagram which illustrates an exemplary operation of a file signature extractor. A file signature is parsed to determine if a file type is identifiable, this is a process which may be done prior to having its parsed byte information routed to an algorithm for receiving its file-print to determine if said algorithm is necessary. The file signature information, which is often contained in the first initial bytes of a file, is a unique code specific to a given file type. An example of such a file signature is the four-byte sequence “FF D8 FF E0,” which is the file signature for JPEG images, as shown in 3203. After a file 3202 is parsed for the file signature information 3203, the values are compared to a database which contains at least a plurality of file signatures of known file types 3204. If the file is identifiable, which is to say it has a file signature value which corresponds with a file signature of a known file type contained in the file signature database, it may have its file type predicted 3205. If the file signature is not identifiable, which is to say no file signature of the same value is present in the database for file signatures, the file is routed to a file-print extraction algorithm 3000 which may conduct a binary distribution-based analysis for providing a file-print to a machine-learning algorithm described herein for determining its file type.

According to an embodiment, the file-print information for a file which is identifiable may still have its file-print extracted and sent to a file-print database 3104 containing file-prints for known file type. This may allow for increasing the training dataset at an enhanced rate, which is an essential component for the machine-learning algorithm to improve its predictive file type result.

According to an embodiment, the file signature may be a general text-based file type such as .ascii. Said file type may have a wide range of realizable file types contained in its bit information. In such a case, the machine-learning based algorithm described herein may determine a prediction for its file type using file-print information instead of (or in conjunction with) its file signature.

In another aspect, said file may not contain file signature information in the first of a plurality of bytes. The algorithm 3000, which utilizes machine-learning/AI functionality, may be able to determine the file type through comparisons with ‘training sets’ contained in a database. Said training sets are files of the same file type, which have had their binary information parsed and analyzed using the methods described herein, and may be used for providing a larger dataset for the machine-learning algorithm to compare to thus potentially improving the accuracy of the predictive result for a file type.

Hardware Architecture

Generally, the techniques disclosed herein may be implemented on hardware or a combination of software and hardware. For example, they may be implemented in an operating system kernel, in a separate user process, in a library package bound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine, on an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or on a network interface card.

Software/hardware hybrid implementations of at least some of the aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on a programmable network-resident machine (which should be understood to include intermittently connected network-aware machines) selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in memory. Such network devices may have multiple network interfaces that may be configured or designed to utilize different types of network communication protocols. A general architecture for some of these machines may be described herein in order to illustrate one or more exemplary means by which a given unit of functionality may be implemented. According to specific aspects, at least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented on one or more general-purpose computers associated with one or more networks, such as for example an end-user computer system, a client computer, a network server or other server system, a mobile computing device (e.g., tablet computing device, mobile phone, smartphone, laptop, or other appropriate computing device), a consumer electronic device, a music player, or any other suitable electronic device, router, switch, or other suitable device, or any combination thereof. In at least some aspects, at least some of the features or functionalities of the various aspects disclosed herein may be implemented in one or more virtualized computing environments (e.g., network computing clouds, virtual machines hosted on one or more physical computing machines, or other appropriate virtual environments).

Referring now to FIG. 33 , there is shown a block diagram depicting an exemplary computing device 10 suitable for implementing at least a portion of the features or functionalities disclosed herein. Computing device 10 may be, for example, any one of the computing machines listed in the previous paragraph, or indeed any other electronic device capable of executing software- or hardware-based instructions according to one or more programs stored in memory. Computing device 10 may be configured to communicate with a plurality of other computing devices, such as clients or servers, over communications networks such as a wide area network a metropolitan area network, a local area network, a wireless network, the Internet, or any other network, using known protocols for such communication, whether wireless or wired.

In one aspect, computing device 10 includes one or more central processing units (CPU) 12, one or more interfaces 15, and one or more busses 14 (such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, CPU 12 may be responsible for implementing specific functions associated with the functions of a specifically configured computing device or machine. For example, in at least one aspect, a computing device 10 may be configured or designed to function as a server system utilizing CPU 12, local memory 11 and/or remote memory 16, and interface(s) 15. In at least one aspect, CPU 12 may be caused to perform one or more of the different types of functions and/or operations under the control of software modules or components, which for example, may include an operating system and any appropriate applications software, drivers, and the like.

CPU 12 may include one or more processors 13 such as, for example, a processor from one of the Intel, ARM, Qualcomm, and AMD families of microprocessors. In some aspects, processors 13 may include specially designed hardware such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and so forth, for controlling operations of computing device 10. In a particular aspect, a local memory 11 (such as non-volatile random access memory (RAM) and/or read-only memory (ROM), including for example one or more levels of cached memory) may also form part of CPU 12. However, there are many different ways in which memory may be coupled to system 10. Memory 11 may be used for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/or storing data, programming instructions, and the like. It should be further appreciated that CPU 12 may be one of a variety of system-on-a-chip (SOC) type hardware that may include additional hardware such as memory or graphics processing chips, such as a QUALCOMM SNAPDRAGON™ or SAMSUNG EXYNOS™ CPU as are becoming increasingly common in the art, such as for use in mobile devices or integrated devices.

As used herein, the term “processor” is not limited merely to those integrated circuits referred to in the art as a processor, a mobile processor, or a microprocessor, but broadly refers to a microcontroller, a microcomputer, a programmable logic controller, an application-specific integrated circuit, and any other programmable circuit.

In one aspect, interfaces 15 are provided as network interface cards (NICs). Generally, NICs control the sending and receiving of data packets over a computer network; other types of interfaces 15 may for example support other peripherals used with computing device 10. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, graphics interfaces, and the like. In addition, various types of interfaces may be provided such as, for example, universal serial bus (USB), Serial, Ethernet, FIREWIRE™ THUNDERBOLT™, PCI, parallel, radio frequency (RF), BLUETOOTH™, near-field communications (e.g., using near-field magnetics), 802.11 (Wi-Fi), frame relay, TCP/IP, ISDN, fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, Serial ATA (SATA) or external SATA (ESATA) interfaces, high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), digital visual interface (DVI), analog or digital audio interfaces, asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) interfaces, high-speed serial interface (HSSI) interfaces, Point of Sale (POS) interfaces, fiber data distributed interfaces (FDDIs), and the like. Generally, such interfaces 15 may include physical ports appropriate for communication with appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor (such as a dedicated audio or video processor, as is common in the art for high-fidelity A/V hardware interfaces) and, in some instances, volatile and/or non-volatile memory (e.g., RAM).

Although the system shown in FIG. 33 illustrates one specific architecture for a computing device 10 for implementing one or more of the aspects described herein, it is by no means the only device architecture on which at least a portion of the features and techniques described herein may be implemented. For example, architectures having one or any number of processors 13 may be used, and such processors 13 may be present in a single device or distributed among any number of devices. In one aspect, a single processor 13 handles communications as well as routing computations, while in other aspects a separate dedicated communications processor may be provided. In various aspects, different types of features or functionalities may be implemented in a system according to the aspect that includes a client device (such as a tablet device or smartphone running client software) and server systems (such as a server system described in more detail below).

Regardless of network device configuration, the system of an aspect may employ one or more memories or memory modules (such as, for example, remote memory block 16 and local memory 11) configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purpose network operations, or other information relating to the functionality of the aspects described herein (or any combinations of the above). Program instructions may control execution of or comprise an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. Memory 16 or memories 11, 16 may also be configured to store data structures, configuration data, encryption data, historical system operations information, or any other specific or generic non-program information described herein.

Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement one or more systems or methods described herein, at least some network device aspects may include nontransitory machine-readable storage media, which, for example, may be configured or designed to store program instructions, state information, and the like for performing various operations described herein. Examples of such nontransitory machine-readable storage media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such as optical disks, and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM), flash memory (as is common in mobile devices and integrated systems), solid state drives (SSD) and “hybrid SSD” storage drives that may combine physical components of solid state and hard disk drives in a single hardware device (as are becoming increasingly common in the art with regard to personal computers), memristor memory, random access memory (RAM), and the like. It should be appreciated that such storage means may be integral and non-removable (such as RAM hardware modules that may be soldered onto a motherboard or otherwise integrated into an electronic device), or they may be removable such as swappable flash memory modules (such as “thumb drives” or other removable media designed for rapidly exchanging physical storage devices), “hot-swappable” hard disk drives or solid state drives, removable optical storage discs, or other such removable media, and that such integral and removable storage media may be utilized interchangeably. Examples of program instructions include both object code, such as may be produced by a compiler, machine code, such as may be produced by an assembler or a linker, byte code, such as may be generated by for example a JAVA™ compiler and may be executed using a Java virtual machine or equivalent, or files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter (for example, scripts written in Python, Perl, Ruby, Groovy, or any other scripting language).

In some aspects, systems may be implemented on a standalone computing system. Referring now to FIG. 34 , there is shown a block diagram depicting a typical exemplary architecture of one or more aspects or components thereof on a standalone computing system. Computing device 20 includes processors 21 that may run software that carry out one or more functions or applications of aspects, such as for example a client application 24. Processors 21 may carry out computing instructions under control of an operating system 22 such as, for example, a version of MICROSOFT WINDOWS™ operating system, APPLE macOS™ or iOS™ operating systems, some variety of the Linux operating system, ANDROID™ operating system, or the like. In many cases, one or more shared services 23 may be operable in system 20, and may be useful for providing common services to client applications 24. Services 23 may for example be WINDOWS™ services, user-space common services in a Linux environment, or any other type of common service architecture used with operating system 21. Input devices 28 may be of any type suitable for receiving user input, including for example a keyboard, touchscreen, microphone (for example, for voice input), mouse, touchpad, trackball, or any combination thereof. Output devices 27 may be of any type suitable for providing output to one or more users, whether remote or local to system 20, and may include for example one or more screens for visual output, speakers, printers, or any combination thereof. Memory 25 may be random-access memory having any structure and architecture known in the art, for use by processors 21, for example to run software. Storage devices 26 may be any magnetic, optical, mechanical, memristor, or electrical storage device for storage of data in digital form (such as those described above, referring to FIG. 34 ). Examples of storage devices 26 include flash memory, magnetic hard drive, CD-ROM, and/or the like.

In some aspects, systems may be implemented on a distributed computing network, such as one having any number of clients and/or servers. Referring now to FIG. 35 , there is shown a block diagram depicting an exemplary architecture 30 for implementing at least a portion of a system according to one aspect on a distributed computing network. According to the aspect, any number of clients 33 may be provided. Each client 33 may run software for implementing client-side portions of a system; clients may comprise a system 20 such as that illustrated in FIG. 34 . In addition, any number of servers 32 may be provided for handling requests received from one or more clients 33. Clients 33 and servers 32 may communicate with one another via one or more electronic networks 31, which may be in various aspects any of the Internet, a wide area network, a mobile telephony network (such as CDMA or GSM cellular networks), a wireless network (such as Wi-Fi, WiMAX, LTE, and so forth), or a local area network (or indeed any network topology known in the art; the aspect does not prefer any one network topology over any other). Networks 31 may be implemented using any known network protocols, including for example wired and/or wireless protocols.

In addition, in some aspects, servers 32 may call external services 37 when needed to obtain additional information, or to refer to additional data concerning a particular call. Communications with external services 37 may take place, for example, via one or more networks 31. In various aspects, external services 37 may comprise web-enabled services or functionality related to or installed on the hardware device itself. For example, in one aspect where client applications 24 are implemented on a smartphone or other electronic device, client applications 24 may obtain information stored in a server system 32 in the cloud or on an external service 37 deployed on one or more of a particular enterprise's or user's premises.

In some aspects, clients 33 or servers 32 (or both) may make use of one or more specialized services or appliances that may be deployed locally or remotely across one or more networks 31. For example, one or more databases 34 may be used or referred to by one or more aspects. It should be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that databases 34 may be arranged in a wide variety of architectures and using a wide variety of data access and manipulation means. For example, in various aspects one or more databases 34 may comprise a relational database system using a structured query language (SQL), while others may comprise an alternative data storage technology such as those referred to in the art as “NoSQL” (for example, HADOOP CASSANDRA™, GOOGLE BIGTABLE™, and so forth). In some aspects, variant database architectures such as column-oriented databases, in-memory databases, clustered databases, distributed databases, or even flat file data repositories may be used according to the aspect. It will be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art that any combination of known or future database technologies may be used as appropriate, unless a specific database technology or a specific arrangement of components is specified for a particular aspect described herein. Moreover, it should be appreciated that the term “database” as used herein may refer to a physical database machine, a cluster of machines acting as a single database system, or a logical database within an overall database management system. Unless a specific meaning is specified for a given use of the term “database”, it should be construed to mean any of these senses of the word, all of which are understood as a plain meaning of the term “database” by those having ordinary skill in the art.

Similarly, some aspects may make use of one or more security systems 36 and configuration systems 35. Security and configuration management are common information technology (IT) and web functions, and some amount of each are generally associated with any IT or web systems. It should be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that any configuration or security subsystems known in the art now or in the future may be used in conjunction with aspects without limitation, unless a specific security 36 or configuration system 35 or approach is specifically required by the description of any specific aspect.

FIG. 36 shows an exemplary overview of a computer system 40 as may be used in any of the various locations throughout the system. It is exemplary of any computer that may execute code to process data. Various modifications and changes may be made to computer system 40 without departing from the broader scope of the system and method disclosed herein. Central processor unit (CPU) 41 is connected to bus 42, to which bus is also connected memory 43, nonvolatile memory 44, display 47, input/output (I/O) unit 48, and network interface card (NIC) 53. I/O unit 48 may, typically, be connected to keyboard 49, pointing device 50, hard disk 52, and real-time clock 51. NIC 53 connects to network 54, which may be the Internet or a local network, which local network may or may not have connections to the Internet. Also shown as part of system 40 is power supply unit 45 connected, in this example, to a main alternating current (AC) supply 46. Not shown are batteries that could be present, and many other devices and modifications that are well known but are not applicable to the specific novel functions of the current system and method disclosed herein. It should be appreciated that some or all components illustrated may be combined, such as in various integrated applications, for example Qualcomm or Samsung system-on-a-chip (SOC) devices, or whenever it may be appropriate to combine multiple capabilities or functions into a single hardware device (for instance, in mobile devices such as smartphones, video game consoles, in-vehicle computer systems such as navigation or multimedia systems in automobiles, or other integrated hardware devices).

In various aspects, functionality for implementing systems or methods of various aspects may be distributed among any number of client and/or server components. For example, various software modules may be implemented for performing various functions in connection with the system of any particular aspect, and such modules may be variously implemented to run on server and/or client components.

The skilled person will be aware of a range of possible modifications of the various aspects described above. Accordingly, the present invention is defined by the claims and their equivalents. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for identifying a file type comprising: a computing device comprising a processor, a memory, and a non-volatile data storage device; a file-print extractor comprising a first plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the first plurality of programming instructions, when operating on the processor, causes the computing device to: segment a file into groups of bytes; generate a file-print for the file, the file-print comprising a plurality of statistical characteristics of the distribution of groups in the file; and a file classifier comprising a second plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the second plurality of programming instructions, when operating on the processor, causes the processor to process the file-print through a trained machine learning classifier to identify a file type of the file.
 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a codebook database stored on the non-volatile data storage device, the codebook database comprising a plurality of codebooks which may be used to encode or decode files, wherein the identification of the file type is used to select a codebook for encoding or decoding the file.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein one or more encoding or decoding parameters are configured based on the identification of the file type.
 4. The system of claim 2, further comprising a file signature database stored on the non-volatile data storage device, the file signature database comprising known file signatures for a plurality of file types, wherein: the file is checked for a file signature prior to file-print extraction; if a file signature is found, the file signature is compared to known file signatures in the file signature database; and if the file signature matches a known file signature, a codebook is selected based on the file signature, and the file-print extractor and file classifier are instructed to cease operations on the file.
 5. A method for identifying a file type comprising the steps of segmenting a file into groups of bytes; generating a file-print for the file, the file-print comprising a plurality of statistical characteristics of the distribution of groups in the file; and processing the file-print through a trained machine learning classifier to identify a file type of the file.
 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of using the identification of the file type to select a codebook for encoding or decoding the file from a codebook database stored on the non-volatile data storage device, the codebook database comprising a plurality of codebooks which may be used to encode or decode files.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of configuring one or more encoding or decoding parameters based on the identification of the file type.
 8. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of checking the file for a file signature prior to file print extraction; if a file signature is found, comparing the file signature to known file signatures in a file signature database stored on the non-volatile data storage device, the file signature database comprising known file signatures for a plurality of file types; and if the file signature matches a known file signature, selecting a codebook based on the file signature, and instructing the file print extractor and file classifier to cease operations on the file. 